delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) |
Message-Id: | <10212011831.AA16642@clio.rice.edu> |
Subject: | Re: strtold is now a standard function (C99) [PATCH] |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:31:17 -0600 (CST) |
In-Reply-To: | <200212011528.gB1FS8123347@envy.delorie.com> from "DJ Delorie" at Dec 01, 2002 10:28:08 AM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL2] |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > strtold is now a standard function. Below is a patch with instructions. > > Basically the patch adds a stub strtold, which calls _strtold. > If strtold is a standard function, stubbing it seems wrong. I know > it's consistent with our rules, it's just feels weird. We could rename the function and stub _strtold. I don't care either way. > > Step 1: Rename src/libc/ansi/stdlib/strtold.c to _strtold.c. > > Do we really need to rename files just because of an underscore? We > don't do that for other stubbed functions. I agree - I don't think renaming the file is necessary
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |