delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) |
Message-Id: | <10211170512.AA14255@clio.rice.edu> |
Subject: | Re: djcrx203.zip refresh (June 2002) |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:12:19 -0600 (CST) |
In-Reply-To: | <001701c28def$271e9110$021ca8c0@helm> from "2boxers" at Nov 16, 2002 11:09:41 PM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL2] |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> looks good. :) That's comforting... > Now to find out about the patch in the cross directory. What specifically is > patch.lib for? > If this was answered already, I apologize for asking again. The dates on the files in the cross directory are in 1996; so these files apply to an early release (the first?) djcrx200 (or djcrx201?) - using gcc 2.7.2. The patch.lib contains a patch for the output format "naming" for the binutils - I think this has all been fixed in recent binutils. It may not apply any more for recent releases, but unless someone does an in-depth review an understands what's changed, I'd prefer not to remove something which has some value to someone. Research on the mailing list archives in the 1996 and earlier time frame might give a hint.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |