Date:	Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:38:42 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.61) Personal
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<6338011457.20021028223842@softhome.net>
To:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GCC 3.2 building with 2.04 trouble on W2K (NTVDM crash)
In-Reply-To:	<2561-Mon28Oct2002223246+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References:	<10210210510 DOT AA21415 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
	<75381002462 DOT 20021022170727 AT softhome DOT net>
	<39723724651 DOT 20021026161829 AT softhome DOT net>
	<1659-Sat26Oct2002170848+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
	<139735779174 DOT 20021026193923 AT softhome DOT net>
	<7458-Sun27Oct2002004757+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
	<5832744494 DOT 20021028211055 AT softhome DOT net>
	<2561-Mon28Oct2002223246+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	28 Oct 2002 20:36:01.0953 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1497910:01C27EC1]
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

>> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:10:55 +0200
>> From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
>> 
>> I've tried getch() and scanf() to no avail, with or without clearing
>> keyboard buffer in advance

> Sorry, I don't understand: what does ``to no avail'' mean?  Did the
> program somehow change its behavior when you added a call to `getch',
> so that what failed before doesn't fail in the version with `getch'?

It runs as if getch() (or kbhit(), or scanf(), or system() ...) call
was a no-op.

Laurynas

- Raw text -