| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se> |
| Message-Id: | <200210141056.MAA17990@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> |
| Subject: | Re: DF.exe problem (was Re: File UItils at Clio 2.04 Query) |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:56:16 +0200 (MET DST) |
| In-Reply-To: | <005401c27365$eb08d170$0a02a8c0@p4> from "Andrew Cottrell" at Oct 14, 2002 07:41:18 PM |
| X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL3] |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > > FYI: I tried compiling fileutils 4.1 with CVS libc some months > > ago. This resulted in a df that had very weird ideas about disk > > space. > > Can you remember what the problem was or how to reproduce it? The problem was the numbers was majorly wrong. Sorry I can't remember more exactly. To reproduce it just compile 4.1 with CVS libc.a and run df and compare with df from 4.0. I first thought the problem was libc, but then I recompiled 4.0 with the same libc and it showed correct values. Right, MartinS
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |