Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3D921394.708AE7A6@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:50:44 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: We've fixed some bugs listed in the bug tracker
References:	<3D8F7B22 DOT 99C7CD9D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200209232038 DOT g8NKcAu10960 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3D8F8703 DOT 6738C4FB AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200209232139 DOT g8NLdDL12010 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3D90BDEC DOT 3759094F AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200209242214 DOT g8OMEcT01337 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > For the ones I closed yesterday: 000230 fixed in CVS; 000352 fixed
> > in 2.03 (refresh++). Perhaps we need some more versions listed -
> > 2.03 refresh 1 & 2.03 refresh 2?
> 
> They'd need to be single words.  "Back when" we used 1.11m3 for the
> "third maintenance release" (i.e. bugfix).  We used 'a' for alphas and
> 'b' for betas.  Given that, how about 2.03m1 and 2.03m2 for the two
> refreshes?

I was going to suggest 2.03r1 and 2.03r2 with 'r' for refresh, but then I
realised 'r' could be taken to mean release. So, 2.03m<number> sounds fine to
me.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -