Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3D392AE9.510B59C7@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:18:33 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 performance & size
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020617191254 DOT 11418A-100000 AT is> <3D389A5F DOT D9813428 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <000d01c22f88$f6616170$0100a8c0 AT p4>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Andrew Cottrell wrote:
[snip]
> > Fileutils 4.1 against 2.03:
> >
> > real    0m50.700s
> > user    1m41.429s
> > sys     0m0.000s
> >
> > Fileutils 4.1 against HEAD:
> >
> > real    0m59.650s
> > user    1m59.341s
> > sys     0m0.000s
> ..SNIP..
> 
> What OS were the tests produced on?

Oops. Windows 98 SE. I don't have access to Windows 2k or XP, so I can't test
on those OS's. I've placed my binaries here, in the same place as the
profiling text files:

    http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/djgpp/workers/

I also renamed the text files to have the prefix 'ls-'.

I'm also going to retest with an empty cache, to see how much overhead there
is in any extra file accesses between 2.03 and HEAD.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -