Date:	Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:42:53 +0100
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.60h) Personal
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<41253079238.20020626164253@softhome.net>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Clio 2.04 packages
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1020616082445.26367E-100000@is>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020616082445 DOT 26367E-100000 AT is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	26 Jun 2002 14:43:55.0443 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5AEE030:01C21D1F]
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

>> I'm not sure this is as much of a problem as is stated here.  Any symlinks
>> would be unusable by old images - but they would also be unusable by 
>> any non DJGPP toolchain program.  So, I don't believe this is that big
>> an issue

> I didn't say it was a big issue; note the ``subtly'' part.

> I just don't like subtle misfeatures.

In fact, when I was writing symlinks, I was expecting big objections
from Eli because of that - symlinks *will* create FAQs...

Laurynas

- Raw text -