Date:	Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:53:48 -0500
From:	Eric Rudd <rudd AT cyberoptics DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Patch for pow bugs
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<3D174E9C.A66BB4B7@cyberoptics.com>
Organization:	CyberOptics
MIME-version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en,pdf
References:	<E17J9QT-0000QQ-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
	<3D138D79 DOT E05E7DBA AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:

> Eric [Rudd], did the patch your posted (which is incorporated into the one I
> posted) pass any regression tests?

I ran the three relevant tests in djtst203: cephes, elefunt's tpower, and
paranoia.  None of those test apps revealed any significant problems.  (Of
course, they didn't find the subtle bug in the old libc pow(), either, but at
least it gives us some confidence that no major new bugs have been introduced by
the patch.)  I see no reason not to commit the patch.

-Eric

- Raw text -