delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sat, 22 Jun 2002 12:43:03 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Message-Id: | <2950-Sat22Jun2002124302+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <3D139EAB.9DCB25C9@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard |
Dawe on Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:46:19 +0100) | |
Subject: | Re: gcc-3.1: old problem with temporary files |
References: | <3D08D753 DOT 9898 DOT 186F2D1 AT localhost> (pavenis AT lanet DOT lv) <3D08F9D5 DOT 4065 DOT 4B0BFF AT localhost> <3D139EAB DOT 9DCB25C9 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:46:19 +0100 > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> > > I think there's actually a bug in _put_path. There's code to remove a trailing > slash, but it only does that for forward slashes. We simply imitate the DOS/Windows behavior for backslashes (their system calls fail when there are extra trailing slashes), but emulate the Posix behavior with forward slashes. On balance, I'm not sure C:/temp\ is a case important enough to change the current behavior. What would be the user-level situation where such a file name could be born? > IMHO it should do this for > backward slashes too. The diff below contains a patch for this. So far I've > only tested it with a demo program, but it should be tested with more > heavy-duty stuff, given how important _put_path is. Watch out for UNCs: we shouldn't break them, even though we don't really support them. > I also noticed what I think is a bug in findfirst. It does not restrict the > attrib argument in any way. We need to restrict it to be <= 255, otherwise we > the bits 8-15 end up being required attributes in the DOS call. Yes, that's a bug.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |