Date:	Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:48:34 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04
In-Reply-To:	<10206162313.AA20553@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1020617074543.4796C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 16 Jun 2002 sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu wrote:

> Not a good test, but ls .../* from my djgpp dir using an old (ancient v2.0b4)
> djgpp ls was 4 times faster than the one built with recent cvs.

("ls .../* > nul" is better, since screen I/O is not involved.)

What about "djecho .../* > nul"?

In other words, does most of the difference come from globbing (which 
would point to `glob' and `findfirst') or from `stat' (which probably 
means we are paying for the symlink support)?

- Raw text -