delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-ID: | <004c01c214fa$28771eb0$0100a8c0@p4> |
From: | "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
References: | <10206131551 DOT AA17658 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <2593-Sat15Jun2002190642+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP 2.04 |
Date: | Sun, 16 Jun 2002 15:52:21 +1000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
> > From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu > > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:51:14 -0500 (CDT) > > > > One of the concerns I've had (and heard from others) is the size and > > speed of CVS images vs current 2.03. > > Any details? I only know about the size bloat when libiconv is > linked into the binary, for i18n. If it helps I can send a directory listing of my djgpp bin directory before and after stripping the files. I also have seen a big difference with the updated packages that are linked to libiconv which seems to be occuring more and more. Regards, Andrew
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |