| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2002 21:05:28 +0300 |
| From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
| To: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu |
| Message-Id: | <8296-Sat15Jun2002210528+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
| X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
| CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <10206141524.AA16081@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu) |
| Subject: | Re: unixy sbrk and win2k |
| References: | <10206141524 DOT AA16081 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu > Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:24:40 -0500 (CDT) > > But I wouldn't expect EMACS to be calling sbrk() when CTRL is being > pressed? Why not? Emacs is a memory-intensive program: Lisp objects are constantly being born and once in a while deleted by the garbage collector. It's quite possible that CTRL is being pressed while Emacs called sbrk, isn't it?
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |