delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:06:43 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <2593-Sat15Jun2002190642+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
In-reply-to: | <10206131551.AA17658@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu) |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP 2.04 |
References: | <10206131551 DOT AA17658 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:51:14 -0500 (CDT) > > One of the concerns I've had (and heard from others) is the size and > speed of CVS images vs current 2.03. Any details? I only know about the size bloat when libiconv is linked into the binary, for i18n.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |