delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200206150936.g5F9aoK27611@speedy.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP and the Large File Summit (LFS) |
In-Reply-To: | <3D0AF51C.1814481D@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at |
Jun 15, 2002 09:04:44 am" | |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2002 11:36:50 +0200 (CEST) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Richard Dawe: > Martin Str|mberg wrote: > > > > According to Richard Dawe: > > > I've just started working on getting Large File Summit (LFS) support in > > > DJGPP. Basically this is a way of supporting files which exceed the number > > > of bytes representable by a positive signed 32b integer, i.e.: 2GB - 1B. > > > LFS has been integrated into the new POSIX standard. > > > > I don't mean to put you off, but why? The file syatem calls only > > support file sizes up to 2^32-2. > > 2^32-2 can't be represented only in the positive part of a signed 32b integer. Yes. So...? Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |