Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:27:59 +0300 (WET)
From:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender:	pavenis AT ieva06
To:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Cc:	DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 [Re: ANNOUNCE: liblocal 0.1: Locale Support for DJGPP]
In-Reply-To:	<3D08D682.BD1028E0@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<Pine.A41.4.05.10206140836140.17998-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Richard Dawe wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> Charles Sandmann wrote:
> [snip]
> > Andrew has done a great job of building many of the applications with
> > the CVS code to shake out issues; we are probably in an alpha test
> > state already, maybe even beta - but since the scope and feature set
> > is continuously changing it's hard to say.
> [snip]
> 
> Has anyone switched to using DJGPP CVS + rebuilt apps as their day-to-day
> DJGPP installation?
> 

I'm using CVS libc for my own applications. But I'm still using many other
DJGPP apps from official distribution, but not all. Here are some of them
I built using CVS libc:
	binutils-2.12.1 (no official DJGPP release yet)
	gdb-5.2 (the same)
	last snapshots of RHIDE available at 
		http://rhide.sourceforge.net/snapshots

Some things I haven't seriously tested:
	a new symlinks support

Andris

- Raw text -