Message-ID:	<3D05A9F9.D45EB608@yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Jun 2002 03:42:49 -0400
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: v2.03 update 2
References:	<10206110304 DOT AA14474 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Charles Sandmann wrote:
> 
> Since I'll be adding copyright lines, why not.  The other suggestion was
> 2002-06 (ISO) for the date.  Since no one commented on it in refresh 1
> whoever feels the most strongly about it (short of an overwhelming vote)
> wins.  (Does anyone/anything look at the .ver file?)

ISO format (2002-06) is language neutral, while "June 2002" is
definitely English.  ISO format sorts naturally, and is an
approved standard.  My feeling is why reinvent wheels.  The
subject is symptomatic of adherence to standards IMHO, rather that
earthshaking in itself.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!

- Raw text -