From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10206110440.AA18724@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: v2.03 update 2
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:40:38 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To:	<200206110155.g5B1tlu23523@envy.delorie.com> from "DJ Delorie" at Jun 10, 2002 09:55:47 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> I usually use something like 2002-Jun-04 when I need to be
> unambiguous.  If the day is omitted, "June 2002" sounds best to me.

No day planned - even committing to a month is a huge leap of faith :-)

Last time I used "12/2001" when I edited the file over Thanksgiving in late
November - last mods were on Dec 25 with a release in January 2002 ...

- Raw text -