From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10206101923.AA18712@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: uclock() on Win2K
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:23:18 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To:	<14ABCA59.4AC487CF.0E256317@netscape.net> from "Alexander Aganichev" at Jun 10, 2002 07:20:14 AM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> I recall that I've already had a problem with that and part of the 
> problem was that uclock() does not check status from RTC. Can you please 
> look on bug 000245 (http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/bugs/show.cgi?000245)? 
> As far as I remember, I had very stable results under Win95. I can't 
> speek about Windows NT and it's clones since at that time I had no 
> access to them and now I'm not intrested in the uclock() at all.

Thanks.  I'll try it and see if it improves anything.

- Raw text -