Date:	Sun, 9 Jun 2002 08:50:55 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Patches for building with gcc 3.1 - *printf(), confstr() chunk
In-Reply-To:	<3D01DA24.F092DEBD@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1020609085026.12685N-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Richard Dawe wrote:

> Which is preferable?
> 
> * Change confstr(), so it doesn't generate a warning.
> * Change the Makefile, so the warning isn't fatal for confstr.c?

The former if you can do that, the latter if you cannot.

- Raw text -