Date:	Sun, 2 Jun 2002 07:51:16 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [Fix for v2.03 refresh] suggested files
In-Reply-To:	<10205301754.AA19312@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1020602075043.10047B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 30 May 2002 sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu wrote:

> Some time back (February?) we discussed this and we couldn't see any
> reason cvs head of djgpp.env would break anything, but it should fix
> things.  Please take a look at the CVS head and see if there's
> a flaw in that logic.

I looked at the CVS version of djgpp.env, and I agree it cannot do any 
harm.

- Raw text -