Subject:	Re: Patches for building with gcc 3.1 - tests chunk
From:	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<200205310919.LAA13003@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
References:	<200205310919 DOT LAA13003 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
X-Mailer:	Ximian Evolution 1.0.5
Date:	31 May 2002 12:34:16 +0200
Message-Id:	<1022841257.28101.2.camel@bender.falconsoft.be>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:19, Martin Stromberg wrote:
> Eli said:
> > What warning is that, exactly?  (I didn't yet install GCC 3.1.)
> 
> Richard's mail dated Sun, 26 May 2002 17:00:53 +0100:
> tests/libc/go32/signals.c: The following line:
> 
>     urand = ((double)rand()) / RAND_MAX;
> 
> [snip]
> 
> assignment is an expression.) In this case we explicitly want to
> convert to double. How to do that? Umm... Let's see... Perhaps we
> should cast it?! 

Wouldn't
	urand = (rand() * 1.0) / RAND_MAX;
work around the warning?  Or does C promote to float instead of double?

- Raw text -