Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2002/05/30/13:53:11
> > > Is it OK to check in included patch for DJGPP v2.03 refresh.
> >
> > I don't see any reason why not.
>
> Commited. Perhaps I should send a patch also to people who get linking
> problems (normally we don't recommend to modify djgpp.env ...) as a
> refresh will not be out very soon
I actually disagree with this specific fix; I think we should use the
current cvs head djgpp.env. It has many changes (such as using +
in the environment variables) so you could re-set the values instead
of editing djgpp.env.
Some time back (February?) we discussed this and we couldn't see any
reason cvs head of djgpp.env would break anything, but it should fix
things. Please take a look at the CVS head and see if there's
a flaw in that logic.
> PS. Perhaps I could help Charles a bit and check in patch for
> sys/djtypes.h too
I have it already in my work area; it was sent to the list in late
Febraruy with no comments.
The problem I currently have is the v2_03_1 root I was working on, the
batch files I used for updates/retags was all lost (disk failure). I
have recovered many key files from other sources but work and family
have prevented me from doing something as simple as even putting
these files in the right directory tree structure.
Even my "to do" list was lost - so I'm working from a very bad memory :-(
Here's what I've got:
Directory of D:\djgpp\upd2
05/24/2002 11:17p <DIR> .
05/24/2002 11:17p <DIR> ..
03/10/2002 10:32p 827 djdev203.dsm
05/23/2002 10:57p 54 djdev203.ver
03/02/2002 05:17p 3,592 djgpp.env
02/27/2002 10:52p 1,261 djtypes.h
03/05/2002 10:34p 22,141 readme.1st
02/27/2002 11:05p 2,652 string.h
6 File(s) 30,527 bytes
Contents are in http://clio.rice.edu/djgpp/upd2.zip
Review of these before putting them in an updated zip would be good;
checking these in to the v2_03_1 root would also be good if everyone
is happy with them. Anything missing? Too much?
- Raw text -