Message-ID:	<002701c2047b$d47437f0$0102a8c0@acceleron>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<200205251323 DOT PAA07405 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Subject:	Re: refresh++
Date:	Sun, 26 May 2002 16:08:29 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin,
> What is this crap? Surely an empty format string is allowed and ok. I
> suggest you find if there's a specific warning that can be switched
> off and do that.

1) No it is not crap and I take offence at your comment.
2) If you had read the entire thread then you will have seen that the empty
string is the problem with GCC 3.1
3) As inidicated in this thread and another thread the LIBC code needs to be
patched in order for it to compile with GCC 3.1 that has been released.

By the way have you tried to rebuild the LIBC with GCC 3.1? If not could you
give it a go and let me know what you find as this would be very helpfull
and will allow me to asertain if I have totally screwed up my system or
there is some other issue lurking in the background that I have not found
yet.

Thanks,
Andrew

- Raw text -