Message-ID:	<002c01c202f4$1cdf0990$0102a8c0@acceleron>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<10205240339 DOT AA17287 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: refresh++
Date:	Fri, 24 May 2002 17:24:22 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> Plans are to refresh with the following files:
>
> readme.1st         win2k/xp doc updates
> djdev203.(ver,dsm) update version and misc dsm fixes
> djgpp.env          env variable updates
> string.h           gcc 3.x fix
> djtypes.h          gcc 3.x fix
>
> No plans to try any binary updates.  Is that what everyone remembered?

Sounds okay, but until the LIBC code is patched to build with GCC 3.1 you
may want to add a readme specific for GCC 3.1 that says something like:-
    The current LIBC needs to have a number of funtion calls changed due to
stricter checking and some type changes that are included in GCC 3.1

I should be able to produce a series of patches this weekend. So far the
following files are affected (ran out of time to finish this the other
day):-
    fprintf.c
    fscanf.c
    printf.c
    remove.c
    ...... more to come

Regards,
Andrew

- Raw text -