| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| Message-ID: | <3CE3D4EE.5DBF820B@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 May 2002 11:49:02 -0400 |
| From: | CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> |
| Organization: | Ched Research |
| X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) |
| X-Accept-Language: | en |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Malloc/free DJGPP code |
| References: | <10204222312 DOT AA16592 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3CE37BCA DOT F5DE2858 AT yahoo DOT com> <557-Thu16May2002145925+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 05:28:42 -0400 > > From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> > > > > The other thread about emacs seems to indicate that problems arise > > from releasing sbrk segments back to the system. > > Our sbrk cannot return memory to the system, so no problems can ever > arise out of that ;-) It cannot be told to supply a negative increment, thus reducing the portion supplied (question, not statement)? That appears to be the only way the interface could work. -- Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |