| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:53:56 +0300 (IDT) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
| To: | Andrew Cottrell <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au> |
| cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Patch 2.5.3 binaries on Windows 2000 |
| In-Reply-To: | <004f01c1ef6c$2b7c7e10$0102a8c0@acceleron> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020429165146.27060D-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Andrew Cottrell wrote: > On a tangent: If there is a later version of patch instead of re-building > 2.5.3 would it be worth updating to the latest release if there is a later > official release? IIRC, the latest Patch made some changes that were non-trivial to port, but the user-visible changes were nil. That's why I decided at the time not to invest any effort in v2.5.4. I don't remember the details, but I could dig them up if anyone is interested.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |