Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2002/03/15/02:59:39
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 00:08:38 -0500
> From: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org>
>
> I don't know about others, but my general practice is to establish a
> duplicate DJGPP setup on another partition, since I do not use a
> sub-directory to install DJGPP in the first place. I then do new
> configures and makes and make install's from the source directory in
> the "test" setup.
Exactly the same thing here. In addition, my production tree is
modified in small but significant ways, so I'm _positive_ a
simple-minded "make install" *will* ruin something there.
> All this extra setup work comes from my paranoia about accidentally
> wrecking my "production" setup
Right.
> When I'm happy that it's "ready", then I rebuild it in the "production"
> environment so I don't have to itemize and manually copy all of the
> installed elements; that's what make install is supposed to do for me
> :)
What I do instead is produce a fooNNNb.zip file from the test tree,
and then unzip it over my production tree. Since making a binary zip
involves producing a .mft file, it forces me to decide what files to
include and which not to. The result is that I only put into the zip
files that are to be distributed, and that excludes any DIR files.
So in my production tree, packages are never installed by "make install".
- Raw text -