Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2002/03/10/15:47:28
At 12:14 PM 3/10/02 -0500, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
<Snipped>
>Adding an alphabetical listing will make DIR very long, so please
>tell what do you think that will be useful for. Perhaps there are
>alternative ways of achieving the same goal(s).
Personally, I don't think it will add any usefulness to DIR. But I did
think it was a good idea not to depend on my own preferences alone, so
I posed the question to the community.
In my (admittedly limited) experience, "info <utility name>" is
sufficient when I need to look up individual utilities.
>> Editing files
>> * Ed: (ed). GNU Ed, a simple but powerful text editor.
>> * Emacs: (emacs). The extensible self-documenting text editor.
>
>The Emacs entry is redundant: Emacs comes with its own DIR files, and
>Info concatenates all the DIR files it finds along INFOPATH. So in
>practice, there will already be an entry for Emacs if the user has
>Emacs installed. (The DIR file from the Emacs distribution has quite
>a few additional entries, in addition to the Emacs entry proper, for
>the auxiliary manuals it brings, so duplicating just one could be
>confusing.)
OK, I'll remove that entry.
---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org)
- Raw text -