| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| Sender: | rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk |
| Message-ID: | <3C64612A.62D21537@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> |
| Date: | Fri, 08 Feb 2002 23:37:14 +0000 |
| From: | Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
| X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) |
| X-Accept-Language: | de,fr |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: posix_spanw family |
| References: | <15DBDD66E28 AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Hello. Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote: > To port gettext-0.11at least the following posix functions are needed: > > posix_spawn_file_actions_init > posix_spawn_file_actions_adddup2 > posix_spawn_file_actions_addclose > posix_spawn_file_actions_addopen > posix_spawnp > posix_spawn_file_actions_destroy Looking at the draft 7 (pre-standardisation) of the new POSIX standard, I see that these functions are part of the POSIX realtime extensions. They are intended to replace fork()/exec(). Since we don't support fork(), I don't see how we can support posix_spawn*(). Why does gettext need these functions? > Has someone started to code those functions? I don't think so. At some point I'm going to go through the list of unimplemented POSIX functions (as shown by tests/libclink) and try to implement some of them. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |