delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200202091302.OAA01888@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: Alignment problem |
In-Reply-To: | <200202091234.g19CYUV17283@envy.delorie.com> from DJ Delorie at "Feb 9, 2002 07:34:30 am" |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 9 Feb 2002 14:02:48 +0100 (MET) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to DJ Delorie: > can't use the pointer to store an "int". I don't know if the x86 has > any memory access opcodes that *require* an aligned address. If it > does, then the returned pointer must be at least that aligned. I'm not sure it's a realistic example, but I think the {L,S}{I,G}DT instructions are some examples. Perhaps the only ones? Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |