delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
From: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) |
Message-Id: | <10201301839.AA25926@clio.rice.edu> |
Subject: | Re: Long delays running SED under Win98SE |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:39:11 -0600 (CST) |
Cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv |
In-Reply-To: | <6137-Wed30Jan2002195903+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Jan 30, 2002 07:59:03 PM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL2] |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> I meant something like [abcd]foo. This requires a call to glob(). Okay, understood. And that would require a call to findfirst to see which ones would match. > > It would stop us from doing un-needed searches on all arguments and > > speed up execution; If we quote the wildcard we wouldn't expand? > > The case that hit Andris was already quoted, so obviously globbing is > not the reason here. It's something else in the startup code. I > guess we need to know the details about that 7143h call after all ;-) I'm saying we shouldn't be trying to findfirst at all on an argument if it doesn't contain things which could be expanded. (I think we agree here.. and there is just some bug in the startup code)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |