X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:59:03 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id:	<6137-Wed30Jan2002195903+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
In-reply-to:	<10201301709.AA16366@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject:	Re: Long delays running SED under Win98SE
References:	<10201301709 DOT AA16366 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:09:55 -0600 (CST)
> 
> > > If this is for wildcard expansion - we shouldn't do any operations on
> > > strings that don't include * ? ...
> > 
> > Also [..].
> 
> Why is this needed?  I would expect we would expand anything without
> * ? or ...  

I meant something like [abcd]foo.  This requires a call to glob().

> > It's possible to make such a change in c1args.c, but it won't do much
> > good, since Sed arguments tend to include wildcard characters quite
> > often.
> 
> It would stop us from doing un-needed searches on all arguments and 
> speed up execution; If we quote the wildcard we wouldn't expand?

The case that hit Andris was already quoted, so obviously globbing is
not the reason here.  It's something else in the startup code.  I
guess we need to know the details about that 7143h call after all ;-)

- Raw text -