X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Sun, 30 Dec 2001 13:06:04 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc 3.03 and libc sources
In-Reply-To:	<200112271404.PAA16127@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1011230130545.10061B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > 
> > On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > 
> > > I tried to add "--std=c89" to gcc.opt and got an immense amount of
> > > warnings from trying to make dosexec.o
> > 
> > Could you post those warnings?  I don't know why we should get warnings 
> > for the old standard.
> 
> Ok. Here they are:
> 
> gcc ... -c dosexec.c
> dosexec.c: In function `check_talloc':
> dosexec.c:140: `E2BIG' undeclared (first use in this function)
> dosexec.c:140: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> dosexec.c:140: for each function it appears in.)
> dosexec.c: In function `direct_exec_tail_1':
> dosexec.c:164: `__dpmi_regs' undeclared (first use in this function)
> dosexec.c:164: parse error before "r"

It sounds like --std=c89 defines __STRICT_ANSI__, which masks
non-standard parts of the headers.  Is that true?  (The GCC manual
doesn't seem to say that.)  If this is true, you have no hope of
compiling the library with --std=c89.

- Raw text -