| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
| Message-Id: | <200112251804.TAA11460@father.ludd.luth.se> |
| Subject: | Re: gcc 3.03 and libc sources |
| In-Reply-To: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011225131954.5289B-100000@is> from Eli Zaretskii at "Dec 25, 2001 01:31:51 pm" |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Dec 2001 19:04:17 +0100 (MET) |
| X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Eli Zaretskii: > > if (!check_talloc(found_si ? > > - type->stubinfo->struct_length : 0 > > + (unsigned int)(type->stubinfo->struct_length) : 0 > > This is really ridiculous on the part of gcc!! Does it help to say 0U > instead of just 0, and leave the struct_length part alone? No. Because the struct_length is signed. Right, MartinS
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |