delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200112251804.TAA11460@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: gcc 3.03 and libc sources |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011225131954.5289B-100000@is> from Eli Zaretskii at "Dec 25, 2001 01:31:51 pm" |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Tue, 25 Dec 2001 19:04:17 +0100 (MET) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Eli Zaretskii: > > if (!check_talloc(found_si ? > > - type->stubinfo->struct_length : 0 > > + (unsigned int)(type->stubinfo->struct_length) : 0 > > This is really ridiculous on the part of gcc!! Does it help to say 0U > instead of just 0, and leave the struct_length part alone? No. Because the struct_length is signed. Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |