X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Tue, 25 Dec 2001 18:15:23 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id:	<5832-Tue25Dec2001181519+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3C28831E.107E9A6E@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Tue, 25 Dec 2001 13:46:06 +0000)
Subject:	Re: djgpp: djgpp/distrib/p/djdev203/djdev203.dsm
References:	<200112241912 DOT UAA08738 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3C28831E DOT 107E9A6E AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 13:46:06 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
>  
> > > I don't get this: doesn't djdevNNN provide djdev?  If not, how are
> > > `replaces' and `provides' related?
> > 
> > I think djgpp-dev-env is the feature of mapping /dev/env/MY_VAR to the
> > contents of the environment variable MY_VAR. Hence djdev 2.04 provides
> > djgpp-dev-env.
> 
> Yes, that's right, but, as you probably know, /dev/env is in 2.03 too.

Sorry, you lost me: how does /dev/env/MY_VAR relates to what you put
in "provides:" in a DSM?

I thought "provides:" is a sibling to "requires:".  That is, when
zippo has to satisfy the set of "requires:" directives, it looks for
packages which "provide" the required features.  Did I miss something?

> > > Also, I think we always thought about djtzn as part of djdev (I think
> > > some package I made reuires djdev when it actually wants the zoneinfo
> > > files).  Is that wrong?
> > 
> > I'm not sure but I think so, but it's better answered by the experts.
> 
> I don't know, but we can make djdev require djtzn, if we need.

That would be wrong, IMHO.

- Raw text -