| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Dec 2001 10:26:34 +0200 (IST) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Bash 2.04 & Bash 2.05 Historical summary |
| In-Reply-To: | <009f01c185d0$5f487380$0102a8c0@acceleron> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011216102601.13127K-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Andrew Cottrell wrote: > In the previous email regarding Bash 2.04 I made a mistake the problem with > the path length was in a early beta version of Bash 2.05 and not in 2.04. I > havn't used Bash 2.04 since the last BAsh 2.05 update fixed all of the known > problems, 8-Oct-2001. Which reminds me: is there any reason why the port of Bash 2.05 was not yet released?
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |