delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
From: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) |
Message-Id: | <10112160725.AA21523@clio.rice.edu> |
Subject: | Re: 2.03 utils exe files MIA |
To: | acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au (Andrew Cottrell) |
Date: | Sun, 16 Dec 2001 01:25:06 -0600 (CST) |
Cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <013401c18601$600f76c0$0102a8c0@acceleron> from "Andrew Cottrell" at Dec 16, 2001 06:14:29 PM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL2] |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> When you built the 2.03 refresh LIBC did the exes from the files in the > utils directory get built? These appear to be the last of the old exe files > I have in the bin directory appart from link files & Rhide files. Yes - if you look in djdev203 they are all refreshed. You can see the right libc inside them. I built under Win2K SP2. I don't remember if I built djdev under XP (probably not). If the utils don't get built it is frequently due to something failing in make in the libm build. > Any ideas??? I tried make in the utils directory and it did nothing. I did a > make clean in the src directory and then another make still no good. Very > puzzling. Sounds like a date problem? Could try the debug switch on make to see why it doesn't want to build any. It must see the date on the libraries being before the date on the executables?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |