Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/12/14/23:22:50
> > I'm sure there are some other suggestions
> Only one addition that I can think of that may make a difference if people
> want to re-build thinks, that is :-
> Bash 2.04
This one intimidated me (2.04 vs 2.05, package replacements for libc, etc)
vs a straight compile. I'd need advice.
> > It turns out I have binaries to repackage all of the above done except
> > bnu2112b. With the above list done the goal would be to make Win2K/XP
> > self hosting again via simtel - if something is broken then the user
> > could fix it himself with a recompile/build of a package.
> 100% agree, but they propbably won't re-build the packages, instead they
> will compain that package X doesn't work on 2K or XP. If this occurs then it
> may be worth updateding these packages as and when required.
Today people have a good excuse for not trying to rebuild. Admittedly
some people might complain, but others will refresh a build as part of
the project if they see problems. I'm not saying they don't get replaced,
I'm just saying that *I* don't do it on the first pass :-)
Today, if a package doesn't do certain things (like spawning, renaming to
existing files, special handle ops, etc) the 2.03 images work fine on W2K/XP.
- Raw text -