X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Authentication-Warning:	kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:27:39 -0600
From:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: libemu and profiling (LONG) [Was: Re: Building a profiled version of libc]
Message-ID:	<20011213092739.A9147@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<10112022040 DOT AA14303 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3C134C9D DOT D057D932 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<3C134C9D.D057D932@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>; from rich@phekda.freeserve.co.uk on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:35:57AM +0000
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

FWIW I did not see this with stock djgpp 2.03,
DOS 5.0, on a 386/387 machine.

-: Using the math co-pro (387 not set or set to y) gives a result of
-: 0.122385; using a patched emu387.dxe gives a result of 0.1. Shouldn't the
-: results be the same or at least a little closer?


[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET emu387=c:/djgpp/bin/emu387.dxe
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=Y
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=N
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=Q
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
80387 detected.
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET emu387=c:/djgpp/bin/wmemu387.dxe
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=Y
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=N
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=Q
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
80387 detected.
0.122385

- Raw text -