delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
Date: | Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:27:09 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <200112130227.fBD2R9p31541@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <200112130224.DAA03768@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin |
Str|mberg on Thu, 13 Dec 2001 03:24:07 +0100 (MET)) | |
Subject: | Re: Description of stubs in develop.txiu |
References: | <200112130224 DOT DAA03768 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> There's not much point mailing us proposed changes unless we have time > to comment, is there? A day is usually enough, and if you do have a complaint about a patch, we can change it even after it's applied. I hope by now people who have checkin privs know the difference between a simple patch and a potentially controvertial patch that needs more time. You've seen the patch. If you need more than a day to think about it, just say so. It's not a big deal.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |