delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/12/10/09:42:38

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:42:01 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: v2.03 refresh ready for review/testing
In-Reply-To: <000201c18187$74ce9bf0$443276d5@pandora.be>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011210163947.23701A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Tim Van Holder wrote:

> > I don't know enough about the GCC build process, but it's 
> > quite possible 
> > that "gcc -o foo" uses the linker script, and at least djgpp.djl says:
> > 
> >    OUTPUT_FORMAT("coff-go32")
> > 
> > which defeats ld's default.
> 
> Yes, but if that's true, stubify would still be needed, and I
> thought that was not needed with recent versions of binutils/gcc.

It isn't needed only if you say "gcc -o foo.exe", since stock DOS/Windows 
shells won't run a program without the right extension.  However, many 
Makefile's still don't use $(EXEEXT), so we cannot yet avoid using 
stubify as a general rule.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019