delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200112080234.DAA18649@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP 2.03 update |
In-Reply-To: | <10112080159.AA19682@clio.rice.edu> from Charles Sandmann at "Dec 7, 2001 07:59:17 pm" |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 8 Dec 2001 03:34:54 +0100 (MET) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Charles Sandmann: > I'm really time constrained, and unless something is something more broken That's bad!... > than 2.03 in the current distribution, I'd like to just send the refresh > out when it gets enough testing and then put a push in for the 2.04 > release. There are about 20 bugs fixed in the refresh. If we looked > hard enough we could find some more (like the ident string in all the > stubs has year 101 in it...) Pleaee voice those concerns! (If you don't the bugs will just live on longer...). (I'm currently very unDJGPP-abled so I can't do much.) I hope that as soon I've got my new WINDOZE box (W98) set up I'll be able tp do weekly compiles of DJGPP. Let me take this opportunity to ask if this 2.03 branch (of course I've forgotten the exact name) is the one to replace 2.03? Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |