delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200112080131.CAA18517@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP 2.03 update |
In-Reply-To: | <000901c17f83$9fc51060$0102a8c0@acceleron> from Andrew Cottrell at "Dec 8, 2001 11:59:11 am" |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 8 Dec 2001 02:31:19 +0100 (MET) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Andrew Cottrell: > I spotted change that was missed, but it was also forgotten in the original > 2.03. The stub.asm file ws not updated when DJGPP 2.03 was released. The > stub.asm on the CVS trunk is as is the version in the updated 2.03 source > zip: > > .org 0 ; just in case > stubinfo: > stubinfo_magic: ; char [16] > .db "go32stub, v 2.02" ; version may change, [0..7] won't > stubinfo_size: ; unsigned long > .dd stubinfo_end ; bytes in structure > > My suggestion is to change the stub.asm file to:- > .db "go32stub, v 2.03" ; version may change, [0..7] won't > > What do you think about this? Without me being Charles, it sounds like nobrainer. Isn't the stub supposed to be the sa{m,n]e (a lot of smileys here) version as DJGPP? I could be wrong though. Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |