delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
From: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) |
Message-Id: | <10112041455.AA18688@clio.rice.edu> |
Subject: | Re: Distribution issues |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii) |
Date: | Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:55:32 -0600 (CST) |
Cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011204100656.25578G@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Dec 04, 2001 10:07:14 AM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL2] |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > By the way, should the .dsm be in the .mft? > > If you mean that the contents of the .dsm file should be in the .mft > file, then I don't think so: *.mft are supposed to hold a list of > files only. I mean should the line "manifest/djdev203.dsm" appear in the file "manifest/djdev203.mft" Right now it does not (so doing rm @... doesn't remove the .dsm). I'm not sure how that works (I left it like 2.03, .dsm does not appear). Should then contents of the dsm be changed to allow refreshing over a current 2.03? (says replaces djdev < 2.03)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |