delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
Date: | Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:52:56 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Building a profiled version of libc |
In-Reply-To: | <3C0A1ABF.C95CCFA2@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011202145038.9372B-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Richard Dawe wrote: > Our specs file from gcc 3.0.2 just has: > > *lib: > -lc We cannot update specs until and unless we distribute libc_p.a as part of djdev. If we update specs now, users will be unable to link with -pg, since GCC will complain about a missing libc_p. > The build system would need more invasive modifications to support > building two different sets of objects for the two libraries. I think we should avoid building two sets of objects. Building one is enough of a pain ;-)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |