Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:22:52 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl,
	dennis-louie AT att DOT net, acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
Subject:	Re: df on NT/W2K (was: Re: statfs not ... 7302h and GNU df don't
In-Reply-To:	<10111291626.AA16420@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1011129192151.15785F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> > Could you please check if the values returned by df for network drives are
> > correct when LFN driver is loaded ?
> 
> The values for df seem correct when the LFN driver is loaded on the systems
> I tested (I didn't know it already extended this interrupt, good job!)

At the time, I advised Wojciech to implement all of the LFN API, since 
DJGPP uses most of the functions it provides.

- Raw text -