From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10111291626.AA16420@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: df on NT/W2K (was: Re: statfs not ... 7302h and GNU df don't
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:26:34 -0600 (CST)
Cc:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il, dennis-louie AT att DOT net, acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
In-Reply-To:	<250B3114DA16D511B82C00E0094005F8055AC796@MSGWAW11> from "=?iso-8859-2?Q?Wojciech_Ga=B3=B1zka?=" at Nov 29, 2001 09:02:48 AM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Could you please check if the values returned by df for network drives are
> correct when LFN driver is loaded ?

The values for df seem correct when the LFN driver is loaded on the systems
I tested (I didn't know it already extended this interrupt, good job!)
I tested Win NT and Win 2K (my XP system is gone...)

ntlfn08b.zip is your friend :-)  I'll add this issue to the bugs and
workarounds on clio.  It appears the LFN TSR is the *only* way to fix this
one.

- Raw text -