Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:58:24 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
Message-Id:	<3405-Mon26Nov2001205823+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<001401c17661$03e13280$0102a8c0@acceleron> (acottrel@ihug.com.au)
Subject:	Re: Grep 2.5e beta port to DJGPP
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 33 DOT 0111191312200 DOT 20544-100000 AT bochum DOT stuttgart DOT redhat DOT com> <001401c17661$03e13280$0102a8c0 AT acceleron>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:58:47 +1100
> 
> The only "problem" that I do not know how to resolve correctly is as
> outlined in the partial email I have included below with regards to
> S_ISSOCK. I have #ifdef the S_ISSOCK out in order to get it built. Can
> someone please help in resolving this as I don't have time to do this this
> year. Any help would be greatfully appreciated.

What's the problem with the solution I suggested:

> None of the above, IMHO.  S_ISSOCK is not sufficiently portable (even
> though the latest draft of Posix requires it) for programs to use it
> freely.  I think Grep should only use S_ISSOCK if it is defined, not
> only for DJGPP.

- Raw text -