X-Authentication-Warning:	new-smtp2.ihug.com.au: Host p103-tnt3.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.132.103] claimed to be acceleron
Message-ID:	<001301c16f44$db69d550$0a02a8c0@acceleron>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<004601c153cd$c03c8f80$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron>
Subject:	Re: Info Issue with CVS LIBC
Date:	Sat, 17 Nov 2001 19:49:35 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

I have had some time to look at this today and I found that the info from
the build I did earlier this week does not exhibit this peroblem.

It looks like one of the changes committed to CVS since early October has
fixed it.

Andrew

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Cc: <kkryukov AT lab DOT nig DOT ac DOT jp>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 8:59 PM
Subject: Info Issue with CVS LIBC


> Recevied this report from an end user who downloaded the files from clio:
>
> >     I am trying to use DJGPP C++ compiler under winXP. Everything
> > seems to be fine with October 07 build, except two things I found
> > so far: 1. info.exe does not work actually (not a big problem) - it
> > prints something to the screen after each keypress.
>
> I tried the info.exe on Win2K and a small amount of testing showed that
when
> pressing the cursor keys it looks like the ansi info is printed to the
> display. The cursor appears to almost move correctly, but printing the
> "^[[?" interferes with the movement.
>
> Print        Keystroke
> ^[[B         Cursor Down
> ^[[C         Cursor Right
> ^[[D         Cursor Left
> ^[[A         Cursor Up
>
> On Win 98 the same problem occurs.
>
> The following shows the corrupted top left corner of the display after
> moveing the cursor arround.
>
> ^[le: dir,  No
> ^[[B
> ^[[Belcome to
> ^[[Bented here
> ^[[B
> ^^^^^^[[Bw a t
> the l^^^[[Begi
> ^[[D
>    Th^^[[Ahe D
> retur^^[[ADD,
> for first-time
>
> I suspect that this is a 2.04 LIBC issue caused by one of the changes to
do
> with the terminal io. Anyone got any ideas where to start looking? If I
> start looking at it now it will take me a number of hours before I narrow
> the issue does enough to asertain where the problem may be.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>

- Raw text -