Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/11/09/02:58:58
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > I think one should create 2.04 files there and remove old 2.03 ones
> > from CVS (that is what I assumed). I only think Eli or DJ should
> > change that, or at least one should ask their permission to do that.
>
> We need not remove the 2.03 ones if mkdist doesn't refer to them. Go
> ahead and add 2.04 ones if you wish, but don't change mkdist yet. My
> cvs area still has the 2.02 ones.
>
> Or add 0.00 ones and point mkdist at those. The distrib directory
> isn't critical; anyone making a distribution can find and fix bugs as
> they go.
>
For example I'm running automatic update from CVS and build (if
something changes) from crontab at night time (here in Latvia). Of course
I could add applying some patches before build (currently there are none)
Resulting archives are at:
http://hal.astr.lu.lv/private/djgpp-test/
(when this machine is running Linux)
About updating version:
Is it Ok to apply?
Index: version.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/include/sys/version.h,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -p -3 -r1.3 version.h
*** version.h 1999/06/03 17:22:29 1.3
--- version.h 2001/11/09 07:48:13
***************
*** 13,19 ****
#undef __DJGPP_MINOR
#undef __DJGPP_MINOR__
! #define DJGPP_MINOR 3
! #define __DJGPP_MINOR 3
! #define __DJGPP_MINOR__ 3
--- 13,19 ----
#undef __DJGPP_MINOR
#undef __DJGPP_MINOR__
! #define DJGPP_MINOR 4
! #define __DJGPP_MINOR 4
! #define __DJGPP_MINOR__ 4
Andris
- Raw text -